About Me

Name: amos dettonville
Biography
Loading...

a few short monday morning thoughts

DEMS STEP OUT IN FRONT
false start, jumping the gun, what do you call this? La La, L'Obamba, Hillbillery, and uh, WassisName from that border state ... have thrown caution to the wind and thrown their hats out into the "wind" long before they've even built the ring. 

OVER EXPOSED
doesn't this break one of the rules of thumb in American election politics?  isn't it basically assumed that no candidate can withstand too long in the crosshairs (one word or two? u decide) of public scrutiny? this should be the end season of presidential hopefuls getting their dirty laundry aired, nicely spun, and hopefully rung, hung, and dried by primary season (certainly by election time).  instead, Osamba, ... Obama, ... someone hiked the football and the dems are down the field and running - with no whistles, flags, or chains being moved.  wait, i am mixing metaphors all over the joint... or is that place? hey, it's monday morning.  let's just say, it's like a false start, a jumping the gun, a breaking of dynamic tension, or whatever term you favor - whatever it is - these prez hopefuls run the risk of being over exposed and coming out looking like that old polaroid of aunt betty from that family beach trip in 1972.

THE GREAT SILENCE
anyone notice the glarring silence from these candidates on ... i dunno ... the islamic threat, the war, ummm, ..., iraq?  how will the democratic strategy of side stepping the offer of a reasoned solution to the iraq issue, or any issue, play now? the hats of "seeking the nomination" and the towels of "cut and run" are mid-air and at once being tossed into the ring.  this will be quite a trick to see who pulls this one off.  basically, calling this bush's war and refusing to offer any solution - hmmm, i fear it may not only be dems offering that mixed message of hats and towels flying.  'nuff said.

THAT MISSING WORD
of course, there actually is a glarring silence, a big old empty sound, a missing word in the public square when it comes to the issue of iraq.  no need to wax on, wax off here ... cut to chase: anyone want to talk about VICTORY?!!!  any takers?  anyone? any one? somebody...

A GOOD THING, POSSIBLY?
as these candidates hit the open road - hopefully the American street will be calling out, "I really want to know?" concerning the position of these wannabe's about victory in iraq.  maybe, it's a good thing.  the duck and cover, offer no solution, pin it on the bushie position hopefully cannot last too long in the cross hairs of public scrutiny ... hopefully.

PARTING SHOT
have a great week.

peac4d.
the ramblin' amos dettonville

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ignorants the return

the return of ignorants
the wit and wisdom and whatever of igno (my pet name for  ignorants) is back with this sobering, but worthy read: Mission Accomplished - 2007. here's an excerpt:

"I’m sorry that there appears to be a state of civil war in Iraq, but what does it have to do with anything really? In the past 60 years Iraq has been in a constant state of war of some sort - starting with a violent military revolution in 1958, another violent coup in 1963, war with the Kurds in 1974, a 9 year War with Iran in 1979 and the invasion of Kuwait & the succeeding Gulf war in 1990. Not to mention the requisite purgings after each coup and Saddam, Uday and Qusay’s dalliances with mass murder.

Frankly, a civil war beats the hell out of your government just unilaterally killing you as Saddam Hussein did. At least in a state of civil war you have a fighting chance to survive and redeem your nation.

That is not my point, however..." (read on oh reader)

Prager on Zen
if you missed this - then paleeeaaase! check out the transcript.  i felt embarassed for Howard Zen and that was no fault of Prager's - who was kind to a fault. 

DP: .... You know, there is in your dialogues here in Original Zinn, I think a good part of your view is summarized when you say, “If people knew history, they would scoff at that, they would laugh at that”....the idea that the United States is a force for the betterment of humanity. I believe that we are the country that has done more good for humanity than any other in history and I suspect that you believe that....what would you say on a report card—we have done more bad than good, we’re in the middle or what?

HZ: Well, probably more bad than good. We’ve done some good, of course; there’s no doubt about that. But we have done too many bad things in the world. You know, if you look at the way we have used our armed force throughout our history: first destroying the Indian communities of this continent and annihilating Indian tribes, then going into the Caribbean... (read on - you'll be amazed at what Zen says, how he says it, and how little he seems to know about what he is saying when questioned about his own words - simply shocking, in a way).

i simply would have thought Zen could come close in defending the premise of his latest book - he doesn't IMHO. check it out and see for yourself.

media memos
my round of predictions has begun at media memos - don't take me too seriously - though i am trying to make serious predictions (kinda started late though :-))

peac4d.
amos dettonville
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Honey, we don't live in America anymore...

yep, those are the words that came out of my mouth tonight, "honey, remember, we don't live in America anymore...." it all happened as i was passing through the kitchen, past my drive by american family, on my way out the door to work.

THE SCENARIO
as i was passing through the kitchen, my three (soon to be four year old) was after me for yet another round of tearful goodbye hugs, kisses, and "i love you's," when she said, "daddy, doggy (name changed to protect the innocent) bit me."  she held up her fingers to show me the newly, hardly harmed dog gnawed digits.

"baby, maybe we need to rephrase that, she didn't BITE you..."

"oh yes daddy doggy (again the culprits name is concealed) bit me - here on my fingers."

from the laundry room comes the sound of my wife's voice, "we'll she (the name not to be mentioned dog) did leave a few tooth marks."

inspecting my little girl's fingers, i hear my wife continue, "... but she (aforementioned dog) did not break the skin."

3 YEAR OLDS AND DOGS
some people might not know (or recall) the typical sport which revolves around food, dogs, and three year olds.  the dog wants food, and food in a three year old's hand is easy prey.  our great beast of a dog is a fierce female beagle terrior mix (a fiest of sorts) weighing in somewhere around 25lbs maybe a pound or two more soaking wet. 

her only crime was going for a piece of food and accidently getting a bit of human hand in the process (which she did not bite into like she did the tastey morsel freshly stolen). often i have explained to my darling daughter about how dogs are made by God wanting to eat as much as they can get at one time - and doggy here is always wanting food, always.  so never mess with a dog and their food.


THE SPORT OF CHILDLINGS
but, there's more to the mix between a three year old and dogs with food.  besides the obvious fact that kids tend to hold food in their hands ["baby, use a spoon," or "put that down and use your fork,"] and that food in a child's hand is much closer to dog level, there is the added effect of how kids talk and swing their food about driving the dog crazy.

to top that off, our kid, like many kids, has discovered that waving food about in front of the dog is great sport. the dog dances, shuffles, begs, hops, jumps, and goes through numerous freestyle moves which bring laughter, smiles, delight and those first sparks of kid cruelty to the heart of a child.  let's just say, if three year olds wrote books, mine would be composing a "war and peace" length tome on, "how to torment the family pet with food." another way to put it, this kids completed her masters in the dog food arts and is applying for a doctorate - she works the poor pooch mercilessley.

BACK TO THE KITCHEN
and so, tonight i found myself saying,  "baby, maybe we need to rephrase that, she didn't bite you ... we probably need to say something like, 'doggy was trying to eat some food from my hand and accidently got my fingers....'"

my wife speaks, "but, it is a bite..."

"i know dear, but remember, honey, we don't live in America anymore ... if she goes to school, or blurts out somewhere, 'doggy bit me,' we could lose our dog, our child, .... remember, this isn't America anymore ... "

SADLY, IT'S TRUE
our freedoms are being stolen and they are being lost with each passing year in this country.  i have to say, i walked about most of the night at work thinking about how dangerous it is to live in a country where a child cannot say, "my dog bit me," without the fear of over zealous control freaks zooming in upon us like a dog on a pork chop in the hands of a three year old.

PARTING SHOT
you think i am over reacting? may i leave you with a question: why do you think pediatricians ask such questions as, "do you own any pets? dogs? what kind of dog? how big is the dog? etc.?"  i'll not even go into the handgun or other crazy questions on the list.  trust me, more and more, this is one more slice as to why, we don't really live in the same america in which i was born.  things have and are changing - and not for the good.

peac4d.
amos dettonville


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

the vicissitudes of a war on terrorism

DAILY CIVIL COMBAT
one of the problems with fighting a war on terror is found in the very nature of what i will term, "daily civil combat." daily civil combat is probably best seen by looking at the train bombings in india 2006 (ref).  similar bombings had happened in 2003, 2001, and in 1993 (ibid).  the difference between those earlier bombings and the one this past july?  the reaction.  the very next day (and asap) in 2006 the wreckage, rubble, and resulting fall out from the bombings was cleaned up and the trains were running and filled with people.  in the case of the earlier bombings - this was not so.  daily civil combat in the war on terror is not ignoring the horror, nor the devastation of a terrorist attack but, rather showing a strong response by getting back up as quickly as possible and going about one's normal life.

THE PROBLEM
so, how does, the "daily civil combat" of a people collectively getting up and dusting themselves off and going about business as usual present a problem in a war against those who use terroristic means?  most basically stated, fighting terror in this manner doesn't "feel" like being at war.  instead, it feels like people have just finished a season of normal Christmas shopping, holiday cheer, working holiday schedules, getting ready for the year's end, and having a new year's celebration.  that doesn't seem like war, it doesn't smell like war, it doesn't feel like war.

THE TWO CITIES (SORTA)
so, in the time since the wake up call of 911 until now, we have been busy - busy being a nation and going about the daily business of life.  in this wake two loose groupings of people have come out:

  1. those who think the war is an over there thing, it's iraq, bushes war, you fill in the blank.
  2. those who, IMO, have awakened to the realization that islamic warriors are at war with the west (in general) and with the US and Israel (in particular) and even more generally speaking they are at war within and without the non-muslim world.
THE SOLUTION
i don't pretend to know the solution, if by solution we mean, "how do we get on a war footing without employing the use of a 'daily civil combat' of getting on with life."  terror's goal is to bring fear into the daily of life - and combating this goal, in part, requires that we go forward with strength and with vigor in the everyday world of thought and things in our culture and lives.

i large part, getting on with life is a part of how we fight terroristic enemies (my mind keeps going back to hannibal sacking town after town in rome and yet never truly defeating rome - ref).  however, this sword in our arsenal is double edged - and one of those edges is dull and has a dampering effect - we begin to perceive that the war is an illusion because life goes on and even prospers in doing so.

in a big way, there is a struggle before us at home - to communicate clearly that there is a wolf, there is a wolf and to not come off as a people merely crying wolf when the evening (and 24/7) news is shouting loud and clear the death toll from a what appears to be an unrelated world away.

much to be done.

peac4d.
amos dettonville
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »